When Archaeology CONFIRMS the BIBLE- Belshazzar and the book of Daniel
1,336
Published 2024-06-14
All Comments (17)
-
Really well put together video! Keep up the great work! I can't believe you only have 166 subscribers - you deserve more!
-
Can't wait for part two, thank you for your time and dedication.
-
Definitely would like to see more archaeological discoveries corroborating the Bible!
-
Part two, definitely!
-
There is so much controversy among non-believers concerning Daniel and his prophecies. Many non-believing scholars date the writing of Daniel centuries after Nebuchadnezzar's reign because they do not believe the accuracy of his prophetic words. Of course we know that God's Prophets had to be 100% accurate, and Daniel was! As far as I have read, scholars have found no record that the Darius of Daniel 6 was a historical person. Yes, please do a part 2.
-
A prime example for human blind and rude pride is the people that dismiss ancient scriptures full of intricate details, preseved by the generations - fiction!! I mean how on earth can you conclude that?!?! Some people!!
-
Yes please make a 2nd part. If you can provide some sources for further study, that would make it even more awesome. Thank you!!
-
Great channel!
-
In which museums are the cylinder and tablet displayed?
-
Seems to me Denying such a Book as Daniel warrants denying the entire Old Testament! It is the New Testament that we should question!
-
Thanks. I'd like to see more. Archeology is something I know little about. Nice to have verification.
-
There is a reason why non-believers attack the book of Daniel. Jesus Himself referred to Daniel, so if you can make Daniel out as a forgery, the divinity of Christ starts to crumble. Do not give into that temptation and believe!
-
Stephen King's books 'confirm' the existence of many, many contemporary things, but that does not make Stephen Kings stories all true. Some true facts thrown in with a lot of fiction does not make a history, it just makes the overall story seem more realistic.
-
Being surprised by the finds of biblical archaeology is like being surprised after finding the original of a story after reading fan fictions about it. There of course are elements of truth (or the original work) in it. But that doesn't prove the information in the bible (or the fan fiction) to be true (or canon). Still an interesting discipline (and well funded, unlike other archaeological disciplines)
-
So what , someone is named in a book, and there is evidence for a ruler by archaeology, this makes other claims per se not (more) true from that book....š§āļøThe city of Ebla is not found in the bible, but has played a huge role in the neighborhood, strange.
-
First, Daniel didnāt write the book, secondā¦the information you offered was already known for over 150 years, itās not new news to me or many other people! Lastly thereās in the biblical narrative mythology, legends and history! If youāre unable to recognize thatā¦school hasnāt been useful!
