Legal Scholar Says Supreme Court Could Become a “Pointless Institution” | Amanpour and Company

Published 2023-05-17
Growing numbers of Americans no longer trust the Supreme Court, and Stephen Vladeck argues that part of the reason is the rise of the so-called “shadow docket.” This refers to cases that are decided quickly, without written opinions or oral arguments. In his new book, Vladeck traces the transformation of the Supreme Court. He explains all to Hari Sreenivasan.

Originally aired on May 17, 2023

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Major support for Amanpour and Company is provided by the Anderson Family Charitable Fund, Sue and Edgar Wachenheim, III, Candace King Weir, Jim Attwood and Leslie Williams, Mark J. Blechner, Bernard and Denise Schwartz, Koo and Patricia Yuen, the Leila and Mickey Straus Family Charitable Trust, Barbara Hope Zuckerberg, Jeffrey Katz and Beth Rogers, the Filomen M. D’Agostino Foundation and Mutual of America.

Subscribe to the Amanpour and Company. channel here: bit.ly/2EMIkTJ

Subscribe to our daily newsletter to find out who's on each night: www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-company/newsletter/

For more from Amanpour and Company, including full episodes, click here: to.pbs.org/2NBFpjf

Like Amanpour and Company on Facebook: bit.ly/2HNx3EF

Follow Amanpour and Company on Twitter: bit.ly/2HLpjTI

Watch Amanpour and Company weekdays on PBS (check local listings).

Amanpour and Company features wide-ranging, in-depth conversations with global thought leaders and cultural influencers on the issues and trends impacting the world each day, from politics, business and technology to arts, science and sports. Christiane Amanpour leads the conversation on global and domestic news from London with contributions by prominent journalists Walter Isaacson, Michel Martin, Alicia Menendez and Hari Sreenivasan from the Tisch WNET Studios at Lincoln Center in New York City.

#amanpourpbs

All Comments (21)
  • @wandaway1961
    It became pointless when it decided Bush v Gore. It became a joke when McConnell didn't allow Obama his nomination. Itis purely political now.
  • @kesart8378
    Essentially, the Roberts Court response is, 'We don't owe the American people a bloody explanation for anything that we decide.'
  • @JeffreyWallk
    SCOTUS is supposed to promote reason not treason
  • @foma518
    I'm not expert but what this guy said is spot on. The Justices have lost all credibility when we can't trust their judgement.
  • @gener.1253
    A Supreme Court Justice's job is to rule on laws based on only the Constitution. Not based on their personal beliefs, their religious beliefs or deposits into their bank accounts. Our current Supreme Court has failed miserably on all counts!
  • Scotus is corrupt. Thank you for further shining a light in this disgusting darkness.
  • Not only shadow docket, but evidence of bribes & other corruption by justices have also undermined confidence in SCOTUS.
  • @kesart8378
    The towering arrogance of Alito, Thomas and Roberts is truly infuriating.
  • @judysocal8682
    McConnell's shenanigans regarding filling seats is another factor undermining trust in the court
  • @really2345
    I have lost respect for all three branches of the government. I have no respect for the Supreme Court since the Citizens United decision.
  • The Supreme Court has no independent enforcement mechanism. If other branches of government decide to ignore its decisions, there is nothing that the Supreme Court can do about it. All that it would take would be for other branches of government to determine that Marbury vs. Madison was incorrectly decided, and the Supreme Court would be neutralized. This is a scary prospect, as we need a strong check on the legislative and executive branches, and especially on state governments, which are capable of the greatest evils. However, we need actual judges on the Supreme Court, but we currently have extremist priests masquerading as judges, and they need to be removed. The institution as it now stands is illegitimate.
  • No transparency equates to no accountability. So much reform is needed. Corrupt, unethical and unjust.
  • @shiva2731
    We are witnessing the folly of lifetime appointments without any recourse for violations of ethics and laws. This is one of the foremost problems in this country.
  • Absolutely. I'm even more impressed with Vladeck. The institution is utterly corrupted, unfortunately.
  • The motto of the absolute Bourbon kings of France was, “never apologise, never explain!” The Supreme Court appears to have adopted the same motto.😊
  • I’ve lost all respect for the SC which is sad day for me. In the last few years my eyes have really been opened and it’s shattering to see how truly corrupt our govt is. We elect completely easily manipulated unqualified personalities to run the country. We allow mad men/women to dictate our rights.
  • @roblowe1987
    There is nothing in the constitution that gives the Supreme Court the power it claims to have.
  • When you give 9 people absolute power and authority they no longer believe that they are pubic servants. This Supreme Court thinks that they are all kings and that we, the American public, should defer to our "betters".