Why Are T 90 Tanks Losing the War in Ukraine
414,550
Published 2024-03-08
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
All Comments (21)
-
No matter how formidable a tank, any tank, it is easily destroyed by drones, and very often the first time.
-
If we put any other tank in place of the T-90, we would obtain the same observation. The weapon that is the tank is no longer such a decisive weapon in a contemporary conflict context where drones, anti-tank weapons and satellites are omnipresent. The only difference is that the Russians have more tanks than the others.
-
why are all tanks losing the war makes more sense.Drones ISR targeting help ATGMS.looks like unmanned smaller means more effective in the future in silent swarm electric drive
-
I'm pretty sure the Russian T-90 tanks are not "losing the war in Ukraine"
-
You can make "trendy and click bait" titles but we know the truth. The T-90 was barely deployed until recently. The T-72 was the most prominent tank at the onset. Dont give me this bs video. Challenger, leopard, abrams and all other tanks failed the same. This channel is starting to suck.
-
Every tank can burn . No matter eastern or western . It is foolish to think they are indestructible. Low profile, good chassis or safe ammo compartment...all that is nothing if AP shell is fired . Even a single , old rpg7 can be dangerous
-
They are not losing they have the best ejecting turrets in this war doesn't anyone realize these are highly trained cosmaunauts manning these machines
-
Just remember our challengers didn’t fair well neither did any western equipments
-
Russia is taking Ukrainian fortified positions and you say Russia is losing? You need to stop coping
-
Let's do a little math. Today marks 744 days since the start of the war. According to this video, 57 T90s have already been lost, which gives an average of 1 tank every 13.05 days on a front of more than 1000 km. The invasion of Iraq occurred between March 20 and May 1, 2003, it lasted 44 days and they lost 31 Abrams which means 1 Abrams lost every 1, 31 days....the Iraqis did not have Javelin, no mines, no drones, they were not trained by NATO, did they have not Starlink, ect, ect, ect......🤔🤔🤔😂😂😂
-
In two years of war, 57 tanks is almost nothing…
-
Recently there was a rare tank-on-tank encounter between Abrams and T-72 B3M. Old Soviet tank dispatched American marvel of technology with one shot.
-
Yesterday Abrams M1 fired by T72 🤡
-
Did you get paid to make a 180°? What happend to u?
-
Could you do a video on the Agm 86 vs Kh 55
-
Drones have become dominant. Main battle tanks and attack helicopters are becoming too costly and less relevant.
-
Not going to mention how a t72 just 1 hit an Abrams? 😂😂
-
Losing the war is a bit exaggerated, or does the term losing in Ukrainian mean winning? that would explain a lot 😂
-
Attack drones are cheaper than T-90 tanks
-
Ah! yes... the Challenger, Leopard and M1 Abrams have been a real game changer.. indestructible and invincible with their perfect design and top tier protection system..... while every Russian equipment is riddled with flaws and weaknesses