Weird Tanks in History

Thank you to Warthunder for sponsoring this weird tanks ep! get a massive, free bonus pack including, vehicles, boosters and more here: playwt.link/simplehistory

Few can comprehend the absolute power of the Bob Semple Tank. That's why Imperial Japan abandoned it's idea of invading Australia out of fear of the might of the Bob Semple Tank

Sweden's tank design department never cease to amaze me

The Bob Semple tank was actually an example of true engineering genius. The armor of the tank was so thin that the shaped charge of another incoming tank round wouldn't even detonate against it. The Semple would simply drive into the middle of a bunch of enemy tanks and they'd all shoot at it, and their shells would fly through the Semple's armor, out the other side, and hit their teammates by accident, Looney Toons style.

The Bob Semple was so amazing that its successor, the Killdozer wasn't pit into production for decades.

Fun fact: The US army managed to loose one of the T-28 "doom turtle" for 27 YEARS, they later found it in Fort Belvoir, it was there So long that there started growing grass INSIDE of the tank...

The Bob Semple Tank was so revolutionary that it had no actual blueprints that could be stolen by enemy spies.

Sidenote, the Strv 103 was the swedish MBT for quite a while and would have worked pretty well in a defensive position.

The strv 103 was designed with a completely static gun as Swedish engineers realised that most tanks stopped before shooting so having a turret was deemed unnecessary for a tank intended fo defence. As the commies were likely only going to come from one direction so they wouldn't have to worry about flaking manovers as much. So a static gun was deemed better. It also ment that having every crew member having there own controls wouldn't be a problem as everyone can aim the gun if the gunner gets injured.

It’s insane how far the innovations in tank design have gone in the last 50 years, always fascinating to learn about

"I don't see anyone coming up with any better ideas " ~Gigachad Semple

One thing I always appreciated about Sweden is that when a tank became out of date, they would recycle the turrets into coastal guns. They have a long history of doing so, stretching all the way back to the Strv m/41 and other early WWII tanks. The Strv 74 would go on to become a central element of Swedish coastal defense, and those turrets remained in service into the 2000s, I believe. I don't know if they used their Centurion turrets for that purpose, and obviously the S-tank couldn't be used that way. Now with anti-ship missiles having taken over, there really isn't any need for coastal guns, which is sad. I've always been fascinated by them, especially converted from tank turrets.

I feel like the strv74 was designed around swedens plan to counter an invasion, which as I understand it was pretty much firing hull down and being able to quickly retreat. Hence why the later Swedish Mbt the strv 103 had amazing hull down capabilities, as fast a backup speed as forward, and could operate with only one crew member although 3 is definitely better. The sweds don’t have the largest population so they dosing tanks to protect the crew as much as possible, tanks are replaceable, good crews aren’t. Edit: as I understand it’s a modernization of the 42, I just mean to say with a powerful gun and a slim frontal turret profile I believe it may have been the start of the defensive tank strategy.

The Swedish Strv 103 was specific designed to defend Sweden in case of the feared, but never materialized Soviet invasion. If the Soviet Army gained ground in Sweden, the Strv 103 would deployed with Hit and Run tactics. So suddenly appearing out of the forest (Sweden consist of 80 % forest), shoot 1, maybe 2 Soviet tanks and disappear back into the forest. Keeping the Soviets at their toes all the time. Wearing the Soviets out.

4:42 Tutel!

I'm a Swede, and the fact that two Swedish tanks was mentioned just amuses me a lot. We Swedes sure loves coming up with weird and crazy ideas

To be fair. New Zealand had very limited resources at the time, so Bob's Simple Tank was good for what it was and for what they had avaliable.

Bob Semple: I don’t see anyone else coming up with ideas Schofield tank: am I a joke to u?!

The Bob Semple could have actually worked in it's intended role - infantry support. Japan was notoriously poor in the Armor department. And somehow even worse in the Anti-Armor department. Poor Steel Production, a focus on the Navy and Airforce over the Army and a focus on Naval invasions over land warfare made for very light tank designs. Stuff you could easily destroy with AT guns. Leaving you as the only one that brought a tank. And it was built from a tractor via a A-Team Montage.

Fun Fact: (0:10) the T-28 scene used is clearly inspired by the greatest tank movie of all time "Girls Und Panzer Der Film". Literally the exact scene