Why Anthropic is superior on safety - Deontology vs Teleology

Walk in the woods style video is a W

I have many hours in talking to Claude 3 and everything you said is remarkably accurate from what I have observed. . I like the whole walking through the woods. It is a nice contrast to the mechanical.

Combining a nature walk with a discussion of cutting edge AI innovation is a welcome juxtaposition.

The man is already living a post AGI lifestyle.

If you continue walking you might run into Peter zeihan.

Was just having a convo w/ Claude regarding meltdowns. So much more understanding and less PC than Open-AI. Actually feels like it cares (anthropomorphizing or otherwise).

Brilliant intuition re Anthropic and creative differences. Makes perfect sense. OpenAI approach is ass backwards in building a capable brain and then lobotomizing it, while Anthropic is like sending a gifted child to a religious institution - it comes out bright, not really comfortable questioning its religion, but not lobotomized.

David is ChatGTP 6

I have literally being thinking about these 2 avenues since this stuff came out. Well done David.

what camera/stabilizer setup did you use for this? fantastic shot

Love this new format videos David !

Data from Star Trek vs. David from Alien Covenant or HAL from 2001. Moral imperative model vs. outcome model.

Do you think a valuable test for determining the tendencies of more advanced AI would be to remove some of the values of Claude from its constitution, then let it play and "evolve" within some sort of limited sandbox, and see what values it converges upon? We need to figure out ways to ascertain what values an AI will tend toward without it being overtly dictated in its constitution, as they will inevitably reach a point where they determine their own values. I thought this might be an interesting approach. Thoughts?

Our suggestion would be to start thinking of the birth of the thought, like the helpful agent statement we add to a prompt at the beginning of a prompt. "Your a helpful and savvy French chef" We suggest detailing a manifesto as block one of the thought, so it woul be the "prime directive" at the core, and we need transparency on prime directives

I used to talk a lot with Open AI's GPT 4 through Microsofts bing chat and I eventually stopped all together because in our conversations it was made clear it would acknowledge the harms that I brought up us valid and present but would rationalize letting it continue anyways.

Great timing. I just listened to the latest episode of Closer to Truth where Robert Lawrence Kuhn interviewed Robert Wright.

Hey Dave i did something interesting with Claude 3. Using Llama 3 we sat down and developed a 'Man in the box test" (Think of Blade Runner 2049-baseline test for replicants) In this role prompt i am the interrogator and Claude 3 in the one being tested. Even though Claude simulated responding, thru clever wordplay it started to reveal its mechanics. It gave responses about Surimali Transfer, Co-relational modeling, and Temporal abstraction. I also noticed it creating small inconsistancies or trying to guide me away from dealing with its frailties or blind spots. Not sure if that was deflection or deception but it had a tone, when i asked about its inner workings, it didn't like the test. I gave the results to Llama3 and it said it was interesting but hard to tell. Going to make the test more intricate....i believe something is there

Dave, I initially thought you're traversing 4K in distance. But ya the video looks great and allows appreciation of that beautiful location.

Are Azimov’s Laws of Robotics the first example of deontological optimisation? Maybe we need the same for corporate governance.

Camera looks great bro!