Episode 45: Leonard Susskind on Quantum Information, Quantum Gravity, and Holography

159,842
0
Published 2019-05-06
Blog post with audio player, show notes, and transcript: www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2019/05/06/ep…

Patreon: www.patreon.com/seanmcarroll

For decades now physicists have been struggling to reconcile two great ideas from a century ago: general relativity and quantum mechanics. We don’t yet know the final answer, but the journey has taken us to some amazing places. A leader in this quest has been Leonard Susskind, who has helped illuminate some of the most mind-blowing ideas in quantum gravity: the holographic principle, the string theory landscape, black-hole complementarity, and others. He has also become celebrated as a writer, speaker, and expositor of mind-blowing ideas. We talk about black holes, quantum mechanics, and the most exciting new directions in quantum gravity.

Leonard Susskind received his Ph.D. in physics from Cornell University. He is currently the Felix Bloch Professor of Physics at Stanford University. He has made important contributions to numerous ideas in theoretical physics, including string theory, lattice gauge theory, dynamical symmetry breaking, the holographic principle, black hole complementarity, matrix theory, the cosmological multiverse, and quantum information. He is the author of several books, including a series of pedagogical physics texts called The Theoretical Minimum. Among his numerous awards are the J.J. Sakurai Prize and the Oskar Klein Medal.

All Comments (21)
  • i think that i'm supposed to be here right now , listening to this whole conversation while i'm working in the studio today 🧬
  • @Bpaynes
    Leonard Susskind one of the most brilliant scientists of our generation; also sounds like he could beat the shit out of you in a bar fight lol
  • @rumidude
    Lenny Susskind is a delight! Thank you for having him on the Mindscape Podcast!!!
  • @jaykingston2171
    I idolize Leonard Susskind, I've read and watched just about everything I can find that's been published by him. His fascinating YT lectures introduced me to science and they led me to seek further education. He's one of science's greatest minds.
  • @ZacksMetalRiffs
    I'm a simple man. I see Susskind in the title and I click instantly.
  • @erictko85
    59:24 "And the other thing that makes you think you're on the right track, is when something that you've been thinking about, turns out the same mathematics, the same sets of principles, turn up in another area..." awesome to hear stuff like that from one of the great theoretical minds I've had the pleasure of listening to. Thanks Drs. Carroll and Susskind,!
  • @Jaroen66
    I rarely give instant likes on YT videos, but this one required it
  • @bendavis2234
    I highly recommend watching his theoretical minimum lecture videos on YouTube. He explains many key equations and proofs without getting too deep into the weeds. He’s such a great lecturer.
  • @ed.puckett
    Dear Dr. Susskind, the story about your father at the end was very touching to me personally because you have become a teacher of mine as well. Thank you.
  • @TheSchultzZ
    i love listening to this even tho i dont understand anyting thanks sean love u
  • @robertglass1698
    So, great. Even though I've spent several hours listening to both of these guys talking before, I now understand the Holography better from this than I ever had before.
  • @FABRIZIOZPH
    What I like about him is that he always proceeds with caution with what he says,, Even in response to some of Sean's comments, Because he values very much the meaning and power of every single word, And that is because the only way to truly understand every concept and make real progress with a theory is to be very very clear about the type of questions you ask and the framework your start from
  • I like listening to geniuses. There's no flim flam and waffle. Just pure thoughts.
  • @grahamhenry9368
    Seeing the title of this episode was like Christmas morning as a little kid. My two favorite people to listen to on the same podcast? The only thing I wish they had discussed in more detail is the ER = EPR idea