Movie Theories That Will Ruin Your Childhood

1,942,754
0
Published 2023-10-04
Tune in for some movie theories that will absolutely ruin your childhood!
Suggest a topic here to be turned into a video: bit.ly/2kwqhuh
Subscribe for more! ► goo.gl/pgcoq1
Stay updated ► goo.gl/JyGcTt goo.gl/5c8dzr
For copyright queries or general inquiries please get in touch: [email protected]

Legal Stuff.
Unless otherwise created by BeAmazed, licenses have been obtained for images/footage in the video from the following sources: pastebin.com/sDha7AGa

All Comments (21)
  • @realbadger
    Actually, it's theorized that Mary Poppins is a Time Lord; she has a traveling bag that is substantially larger on the inside, she wears a bow tie (which is Cool), her umbrella is something of a TARDIS (bit of a stretch, that), she's elusive, mysterious, refuses to "explain anything," and can speak to animals. Now with Emily Blunt taking over, we know Mary Poppins can regenerate...
  • @laurabeane8862
    My favorite line in "Cars" is when Mac finds Lightning, and says, "Thank The Manufacturer you're okay!"
  • @qaaidsalih3529
    In the original book, we see that all the children actually SURVIVE and Wonka didn't kill them. And Roald Dhal also said that he hated the first film in an interveiw.
  • @brodynicholas80
    Fun fact: in the original Peter Pan book, instead of taking Wendy and the other kids home, he just locks the windows to make the kids think they were unloved (I think)
  • @cuttabrilove
    Don’t forget that Hook is blamed for the death of Ariel’s mother
  • @DravenGal
    Well, that fly scene is obviously a nod to the original 1958 movie "The Fly" where the scientist who merged with the fly is trapped in a spider web, with the body of a fly but the head and arm of a human, who screams "Help me! Help me!" as the spider crawls closer and closer. Conversely, the scientist character has the head and left arm of a fly. It's pretty darn creepy, and much less gruesome than the remake in the 80s.
  • @X4R80
    As a swiss i can say that i have watched none of these movies as a kid and my childhood is not ruined
  • I had heard most of these before but some of them caught me completely off guard! The Mary Poppins maybe being Pennywise & their similarities in general are interesting to consider. The Harry Potter theories were also very interesting to think about. Very interesting compilation of movie theories!
  • @jacobnardone9325
    The theory that Jar-Jar was intended to be a Sith in disguise would've been a very clever twist. Him willingly choosing to play as a bumbling ally to manipulate events and corrupt Anikin to the Dark Side is a surprising way to add in a twist villain. Take a look at Professor Quirrell from Harry Potter as an example. I'm sure a lot of people didn't expect that he was only pretending to be a timid man to find the Philosopher's Stone for Voldemort.
  • @DATPATRICK
    I loved the animated segments of this video, they really illustrated the general idea of the theories
  • @thepickletrees
    There is a sequel to Home Alone I forget the name but it shows that Kevin goes on to have his own security company while his brother becomes a police officer
  • @user-rr2qj1ck1n
    Don't call it ruing you childhood call it improving you childhood instead
  • @Terahnee
    Problem with Willy Wonka theory - if you read the book (and I believe they fixed this omission in the Johnny Depp version), Charlie sees the other kids leave the factory. Violet is still blue but no longer round, Veruca is covered in garbage, Mike is stretched, and I can't remember but I think Augustus is just covered in chocolate.
  • @DravenGal
    You forgot the theory about Mary Poppins being a Time Lord!
  • @user-ey7ln3pk6t
    Wait this would ruin entire life because I'm still a child 10 years old
  • @eziomorte3380
    Jar Jar plot twist would be one of the best in cinematic history. I believe it was the original plan. Too bad Lucas changed it because of the backlash.
  • Im convinced Mary Poppins is a Time Lord/Lady. She has a bag thats bigger on the inside and she regenerated from Julie Andrews to Emily Blunt.
  • The thing about the Harry Potter theory is that technically Voldemort did kill Harry but Voldemort himself took most of the killing curse Dumbledore did say that Harry could move on to the afterlife if he wanted.
  • Personally, I don't think the kid from home alone. Would some day be a maniac in the future, but not the type of person you would want to trifle with if you ever messed with his family or him?