This Plane Almost Reinvented Travel: What Went Wrong?

9,616,113
0
Published 2019-10-23
Watch More Mustard Videos & Support The Channel: nebula.tv/mustard

Support Mustard on Patreon: www.patreon.com/MustardChannel
Mustard Merchandise: www.teespring.com/stores/mustard-store

Instagram: www.instagram.com/mustardchannel/
TikTok: www.tiktok.com/@mustardchannel
Facebook: www.facebook.com/Mustard-109952378202335
Twitter: twitter.com/MustardVideos
Website: www.mustardchannel.com/

In the late 1950’s, intercity air travel was on the rise. But while a trip from New York to Boston by airplane might only take about an hour, you’d still need to get to and from the airport. And in many congested cities, that was already taking longer than the flight itself. As a solution, helicopter airlines had begun to crop up in major cities, letting passengers skip over traffic to connect airports with their city centers. But helicopters were ultimately too inefficient to become a viable form of mass transport. The Rotodyne was going to change all that. Taking off from downtown rooftops and heliports, but flying faster, further, and more economically than any helicopter, the Rotodyne would be the quickest way to move from one city centre to the next.

The Rotodyne might have looked like part helicopter, part plane, but it was actually neither. Where a helicopter uses engine power to spin a rotor blade to force air down and create lift, on a Rotodyne the large rotor wasn’t directly driven by a motor. Instead it used a freely-spinning rotor called an autogyro. As air passed naturally through the rotor blades during flight, it caused the rotor spin around like a pinwheel to create lift. The Rotodyne still had wings and a pair of turboprops much like an airplane. But in forward flight, the unpowered spinning rotor lifted more than half the aircraft’s weight. To take off and land vertically and hover, tip jets at the end of each rotor blade would be used to spin up the Rotodyne’s rotor. Once in forward flight, the tip jets were shut off and the rotor would once again spin freely.

When the first Rotodyne prototype took to the skies, it could carry 40 passengers over 700km and reach speeds of over 300km/h, all while being able to land and take off on a space not much larger than the aircraft itself. And after 350 successful test flights, the Rotodyne proved to be safe and capable. But despite plans for an even larger more powerful version, a combination of noise concerns and lack of government support for research and development ultimately led to cancellation of the project.

Select footage courtesy the AP Archive:
AP Archive website: www.aparchive.com/ YouTube: youtube.com/c/aparchive and youtube.com/c/britishmovietone

Like the aviation industry posters found in this video? Visit The Aviation Ancestry Database, containing over 80,000 high-quality examples: www.aviationancestry.co.uk/

Special thanks to Nick Arehart for helping clean up our audio:
twitter.com/airhrt_

Special thanks to: Chiba Cheegoni, Gibbo, Jake Hart, Coby Tang, Cole Gerdemann, Christian Altenhofen, Therandomuser, Justin Will, Jefferson Hu, Jean-christophe, Andrew J. Thom, Erik Hoel, Mark Moran, Colin Millions, Joel Salvador, TOOLCO CORP, Razvan Caliman, Joseph Zadeh, Danny Wolf, Matt Waters, Trent Bosley, Christopher Boyd, Guzman Martin, Travis Sinfield, Liam Klatsky, Jerome Froelich, Xan Daven, Donoteat and Kim Alexander Haustedt for supporting us on Patreon and helping Mustard grow: www.patreon.com/MustardChannel

Thanks for watching!

All Comments (21)
  • @MustardChannel
    Hi all - as some viewers are pointing out, it's a mistake to describe a 133 dB to 96 dB reduction as 15%. It's much more than that, as decibels are a logarithmic unit. Sorry for letting that error slip in and any confusion (note that 96dB is still incredibly loud).
  • Why does the British government need to destroy all useful engineering documents of cancelled projects damnit!
  • @jascrandom9855
    "...and it all went to s$%t" That took me completely off guard.
  • I remember, when I was a boy, the sound of the Rotodyne. There was nothing like it. When you saw it flying over you felt like you were seeing the future. And perhaps it could have been, but it was too much ahead of its time.
  • @PongoXBongo
    It should be illegal to destroy research. Maybe shoehorn it into protections on financial records?
  • @tovsteh
    5:08 Gotta love the test pilot gear back in the day: Suit and hat.
  • @LunringNassar
    I genuinely hate how this aircraft didn't succeed, it should really be reconsidered.
  • It almost physically hurts to see this beautiful thing to to waste. Couldn't they just resurrect the project and use today's advancements and technologies to fix the 60 year old issues?
  • @MagicznaPanda
    6:54 Small correction - since sound is on a logarithmic scale, the reduction in noise wasn't by 15%, but rather by 86%
  • @TallulahSoie
    This seems like a technology that should be revisited.
  • @Radhaugo108
    I sometimes wonder how big of a role does "Corporate Sabotage" play in the failures of these amazing technologies. For example, a technology like this would've significantly hurt the "Airport Taxi" industry.
  • @holthogan5562
    I've never even heard of the Rotodyne. Man I love this channel.
  • I feel like out of all the failed projects this one is the only one im like damn thatd be cool as hell and i genuinly think it would work
  • When I was a kid, I put together a plastic model kit of a Fairey Rotodyne, with a detailed interior including seats, passengers, even luggage racks. I really thought it was the wave of the future. Technologically, it could have been, given a sufficient commitment.
  • @JD3Gamer
    I feel like this concept should be revisited to replace medical helicopters. You could deliver patients faster while burning less fuel. A lot of development has gone into miniature, quiet and efficient jet engines that could go on the blades. The larger cab size could also allow for more than one patient to travel at a time with ambulance like medical equipment and staff there for them.
  • I remember the Rotodyne flying over our house! The Rotodyne was based at a small airfield called White Waltham just outside Maidenhead and as a child we lived on the direct line between White Waltham and Farnborough which was the base of the British Aircraft Establishment. On several occasions we heard the distinct sound of the Rotodyne flying over and dashed outside to watch it go over. Yes, it was noisy, but so were most aircraft at that time, especially the big jets like the Boeing 707. The difference was the big jets landed at airports outside the city centres so did not fly low over the houses, except of course the ones on the flight path into the airports. People these days forget how noisy those old aircraft were! A few years ago I heard a racket and went outside to see what it was and was treated to the sight of a Dreamliner on its way to the Farnborough Airshow escorted by a Spitfire and a Hurricane. I could barely hear the Dreamliner - the racket was all being made by the Merlins. A beautiful racket though!
  • Missed a perfect opportunity to title it “Why the VTOL Airliner never Took Off”
  • @Draktand01
    For places like small islands or isolated cities (like those Spanish cities on the Morroccan coast that actually still have helicopter airlines), this sort of thing could be a really amazing addition to their transportation sector.