The Holy Grail: Christianity's Most Legendary Lost Artefact | Secret Of The Holy Grail | Timeline

"He chose...poorly."

"Da Vinci" isn't a name. It means "from (the village of) Vinci." His name was Leonardo, with no surname. Using Da Vinci as his last name is like saying Jesus' last name was "Of Nazareth." (Dan Brown spoiled everything.) Also, Dagobert doesn't mean "dragon pharaoh." It means "day-bright." It's a Germanic name and -bert is common in Germanic names: Robert, Herbert, Albert, etc. The Merovingians spoke Frankish, a Germanic language. Your etymology of Rosslyn is also wrong. It's from Scottish Gaelic. There is no known connection between the Knights Templar and the Rosicrucians. Those places in France (Rennes etc.) are from attested Gaulish (Celtic) names with no reference to serpents. There is no special connection between the Merovingians and ancient Mesopotamian civilization, which are too far separated by time and distance. Dragon is from a Greek word (drakôn) and has nothing to do with Dagon. Levite means "son of Levi" and has no connection with Leviathan. In Hebrew, the vowel in the first syllable is different. Jesus' words in Matthew 16:28 aren't a gift of immortality, they're a prediction that the apocalypse would happen in the lifetime of some of the Apostles. (It didn't.) There is no connection between English words for horse and words for serpent. Nag is a Germanic word that has only ever meant a kind of horse. There is no evidence that the Green Men in many Medieval churches have a pagan origin. Methuselah, not Melchizedek, is the longest living character in the Bible. Ancient sources say the druids wore white, not green. There are other errors but I got tired of writing them down. Was there anything in the video about the Holy Grail? Come on, Timeline, you can do better than this.

What has this got to do with the HOLY GRAIL ?????? Nothing !!!!

This guy leaps from one thing to the next so fast I’ve got whiplash. First we were on snakes, then wandering Jews, then age 30 which are also the degrees between the Zodiacal chart, then bulls, then goats, then Moses, then horns, then Hercules, then the Hydra, then back to snakes I guess. What a convoluted mess.

If it's made of gold and ornate with jewels then it most likely IS NOT the cup used in the last supper.

I’m reminded of that scene in the movie “Billy Madison” where Adam Sandler reads his essay and gets the reply (not sure this is an exact quote): “after hearing this we are all dumber now.”

This is a great example of how people will create their own facts and history in order to fit what they want to believe.

The speculation is strong with this one.

That was some good Medieval Fantasy ASMR! 😴💤

I wasn't expecting an out and out conspiracy theory video on this channel

what a hodge podge of rumors and myths.

I really wanted to keep watching. There was way too much emphasis on the background music, it drowned out the audio. I wish people understood that background noise doesn’t fix or make a video! This was ridiculous! And I really really wanted to finish.

Ten sec of the intro was enough for me

"Ye of little faith...."

Pffft. Hopefully, we get a part II that questions snake aliens, and maybe even Bigfoot, as to what they think of the grail; because we still don’t know!!! Oh, and maybe the aliens are the infamous “Green Little Men”.

I was waiting for a scene from Indiana Jones the last crusade

[posted @ 00:28:41] You do understand, do you not, that Matthew 17:1-2 is used as the explanation for Matthew 16:28, denying any supposed offering of mortal immortality (a prima facia oxymoronic notion for a mortal cannot be, at once, mortal and immortal). By the way, in the entirety of John 18, there is only one mention of Malchus and it does not mention any endowment of immortality to man whose significance to the theme of that chapter was co-incidental, at best, and minimal, at worst. If there be supporting documentation for the assertion, that should have been made clear at this time mark in this production, or an offering of an explanation that this idea is an assumptive part of the myth.

I just unsubscribed to Timeline. I have no interest in this unmitigated carp. Is there any point to this? Ten minutes in and I gave up. Lousy storytelling. How about stating your themes first to give us some idea where you’re going? Actually, I couldn’t really care less about all this mythology.

What the heck is up with the speaker-blowing drum blasting at the beginning, my god that is deafening...

Anyone could claim any ancient cup they found was the holy grail. There's absolutely no way to verify if it actually was or not.