The Problem with Nuclear Fusion

man the script of this video was so repetitive, not sure who the target audience of this video is. It didn't give a single dime of new info

0:02 "...in the palm of my hand" ~ Doc Ock

Earth has a circumference of 24,901 miles... 300 times would be 7,470,300 miles... if you had 8,000 gallons, that would be a car capable of 933 miles per gallon... Bad math on their end.

In just another 30 years, it will be just another 30 years away !

What was the breakthrough?

What does the fusion make and where does it go?

I am awaiting as eager as any man the advent of the fusion era, where energy and, possibly life itself on the Earth, becomes free. But I'm pretty sure this goal will always remain 30 years away as long as only the "triumph of the science and technology" is put to this work. As long as science and technology strain to eliminate and replace the Creator's place from our lives they will not be able to uncover the Creations biggest secrets.

A creationist asked me 1 day “when you fuse 2 atoms do you use a 3 amp or 13 amp fuse?” Haha

The Brilliant Light Power SunCell is cheap to produce.

First person to solve this 5 variable word problem in Fahrenheit gets $200.00 USD. Sounds easy. This simple word problem was posted in a 5th grade Earth Science and Geology class, USA back in the year 1975. These given values are to be used to determine the answer. Show your work. There is a hypothetical planet with a given radius of 3,963 miles. Drilling into the hypothetical planet's crust at the given depth of 12.5 ft. remains a constant given temperature of 55° F all year long. Drilling into the hypothetical planet's crust at the given depth of 40,230 ft. the temperature increased to a given 356° F. If it's around 356° F at around 7.619 miles deep then what is the temperature at a depth of 3,963 miles?

I really hope I get to see nuclear powered rockets before I kick the bucket. They are so much more efficient than chemical rockets.

How to extract usable energ from from high energy neutrons is an impossible challege. Neutrons destroy all materials with which these interact. Fusion energy is a pipe dream

They have been saying we'll have fusion power within 20-30 years since before I was born, and I'm sixty. If fusion is a marathon, then we are still trying to figure out what shoes to wear. While the output of energy was greater than the input of the lasers, it does not allow for the fact that that was only about 3% of the total energy used to produce the test. One of the biggest problems never talked about is we have no way of refueling the reactor without shutting it down. For a comparison image you have a car with a one-ounce fuel tank, and you are driving across the country.

In Tokamak/Iter we could use disc with current that flow from center to perifeeal inside a donate. When such a disc with current flowing rotating it could generate DC current through conductor.(conductive ring around it) This would work similarly to reilgun/Tesla dinamo generator.(first ever lab motors and generators were of this tipe) Advantage of it is absence of inductunce for Direct Current -- which mean you could shove inside as much power as you possibly can deliver through axis and low resistence of plasma doesn't matter (it would result in higher current and higher required torque /input ergy then) Standard methods have a downside that primal coil have its own inductance and if you were to try to breach it forcefully resistance and forces would become even more formidable/humongous and would and up destroying your device. But for Dirrect current it doesn't matter , you just deliver power and thats that. (just like that) 100 million degrees temperatures wouldn't be a limit , how about delivering power so fast that temperature elevate to the 10 billion or 100 billion degree.

a US senator approves of something.. well im convinced. /s

I really like this channel. I think the topics and the voice are sexy. ❤❤❤

So repetitive and boring script! Unbelievable!

😀

The problem is you can’t make enough money off it hahaha

Schumer? This must not be science. We know who you follow, the guy that says 'trust the science'...