Is Nigel Farage right about Putin's invasion? Sergey Radchenko vs Glenn Diesen | SpectatorTV

53,284
0
Publicado 2024-06-27
Nigel Farage has sparked fury since arguing that the West is partially responsible for Putin's invasion of Ukraine. Does the Reform leader have a point? Historian Sergey Radchenko and academic Glenn Diesen debate the role of NATO in provoking Russia, Putin's motivations for the war in Ukraine, and the conflicting principles of indivisible security and the right to join alliances.

00:44 Has Nigel Farage got a point?
05:25 Putin's agency
11:08 Nato expansion
17:30 Mark Rutte

// SUBSCRIBE TO THE SPECTATOR
Get 12 issues for £12, plus a free £20 John Lewis/Waitrose voucher
www.spectator.co.uk/tvoffer

// FREE PODCASTS FROM THE SPECTATOR
Hear more from The Spectator's journalists on their podcasts, covering everything from the politics of the UK, US and China, to religion, literature, lifestyle and more.
www.spectator.co.uk/podcasts/

// FOLLOW US
www.twitter.com/spectator
www.facebook.com/OfficialSpectator
www.linkedin.com/company/the-spectator
www.instagram.com/spectator1828
www.tiktok.com/@thespectatormagazine

Todos los comentarios (21)
  • @Thorsted67
    US ambassador to Russia, William Burns in a memo in 2008:  "Ukraine and Georgia’s NATO aspirations not only touch a raw nerve in Russia, they engender serious concerns about the consequences for stability in the region. Not only does Russia perceive encirclement, and efforts to undermine Russia’s influence in the region, but it also fears unpredictable and uncontrolled consequences which would seriously affect Russian security interests. Experts tell us that Russia is particularly worried that the strong divisions in Ukraine over NATO membership, with much of the ethnic-Russian community against membership, could lead to a major split, involving violence or at worst, civil war. In that eventuality, Russia would have to decide whether to intervene; a decision Russia does not want to have to face."
  • @jossiesh7649
    Why Mr Radchenko is not talking about 14000 who were killed by Ukrainian military forces between 2014 and 2021? Why he is not talking about Minsk 2 which was sabotaged by Kiev regime?
  • @merocaine
    Glen has arguments, the other guys has babble and bluster.
  • How is this even a question? Anyone with any knowledge of the situation has been saying this for years. Ukraine has just been the conclusion to moves that go back well over a decade.
  • After the collapse of the USSR the purpose of NATO was made irrelevant. And yet NATO went on an Eastern expansion mode - bizarre❗️Asking for a retaliation no doubt.
  • @RICHARDGRANNON
    I’m stunned we are debating whether potentially having Ukraine join NATO was a provocation to Russian or not.
  • @privatenoone8911
    Imagine Scotland with Russian bases, airfields, nuclear capable missiles, bio-labs, FSB spy stations, Scapa Flow a Russian naval anchorage and then you know why Russia needs Ukraine neutral and out of NATO.
  • From 1991 to 2014 Ukraine and Russia were able to live peacefully. What changed is Washington inserted itself between them, despite knowing it would infuriate Moscow and potentially provoke military conflict. Moscow is of course responsible for its own actions. But this war wouldn't be happening if Washington had been content to maintain a careful distance. They were warned repeatedly from within and without what would happen if they tried to get between Ukraine and Russia, but they went ahead and did it anyway. The country that is paying the highest price for this decision is Ukraine, and that is unlikely to change.
  • @simonkramer9463
    Farage simply said that it was a provocation. That doesn’t mean he’s justifying Putin’s actions and in fact he has condemned them. Grow up and report the FACTS!
  • Rather than wasting money on Ukraine, the UK should spend money on Britain to improve roads, health service other infrastructure.
  • @khaan5109
    That guy sergey is a complete liar! NATO was training ukraninan troops for over 8 year prior the invasion! They trained about 10 000 soldiers per year! By 2022 that created one formidable army of about 80 000, well equipped and trained to fight Russia (all by the way wiped out already). Also he said that Russia could have negotiated with the west...... they tried!!!! Russia sent letters to washington and nato headquarter with proposal for negotiations at the end of 2021. The west said f off.....Russia had no other choice but to react to this!
  • Is Radchenko talking or is his mouth just moving I don’t see a point he made in his second response? Meirsheimer and many other highly qualified intellectuals make the same argument as Diesen.
  • It's not about Putin for one thing. And it's the US/NATO/EU who engages in imperialism.
  • @davidgriffin8958
    Yes. The BBC interviewed British security staff during the coup of 2014 in Ukraine. It was broadcast mid morning on Radio 4. Then buried. We are not exactly the good guys.
  • @casstor
    Radchenko is way out of his depth. Spouting Zelensky's lies from the comfort of a western place , hiding from mobilisation, disgraceful
  • @EdMcF1
    How utterly unprofessional to open up without specifying what the comments of Mr Farage were or showing us what they were. Call yourselves journalists?
  • @14caz68
    Ok personally think Farage has made a valid point . Should people actually read what he said.
  • @user-wd6ni4xu4n
    Because Cuba does not have Russian missiles. And America has had sanctions on this poor little country since Castro took control of the island. Do again you don’t know history.