Do You Need GCPs for Photogrammetry Volumes?
3,113
Published 2022-11-11
Theoretically, so long as you data capture and processing are done well, there should be little difference, as volume calculations are relative to the surface.
In this video we take a look at a volume calculation result, processed in Agisoft Metashape, when we don't use GCPs and when we do. How will the two results compare?
How you can support my work
-------------------------------------------------
Please consider buying me a coffee:
www.buymeacoffee.com/geospatialtips
Hire me on Upwork:
www.upwork.com/freelancers/~016ba4a9bb38699a0e
All Comments (8)
-
Please consider hitting the subscribe button 🙏 It helps me out SO MUCH and will allow me to create more helpful videos! 😊
-
Yooo thank you, great video, straight to the process🤙 so gcp at the end are just an extra, now i can do other stuff finally with the mini 3🚀
-
Sub'd! Short sweet and more importantly keeping consistency and accuracy in mind 👍👍
-
Thank you for interesting content! Good job!
-
Just to make sure, did you use RTK-data when taking the pictures or only drone gps? The video was great, hope you make many more!
-
Good day @geospatialtips, do you have a video that shows how you to add your GCP's to the processing steps. I see that you mention the difference between processing with and without GCP's. But I can't see a video of you actually adding the GCP's. Can you please advise? From your fellow Saffa mate.
-
I would love to see this experiment repeated in a situation where the ground is not nice and level and the stockpile is bunkered.
