Gregory Malchuk on the NimCast

Publicado 2019-02-21

Todos los comentarios (18)
  • @coocoodog1232
    I had a great time on the nim-cast with you. For anyone wondering, there is a discord group for intactivists. Just comment at Gregory if you want to get the invite link.
  • @jeffrey7737
    States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard
  • @otaviomoraes9941
    How soon we proceed onto clinical trials and make the procedure publicly available is entirely up to you! It is not inconceivable that we can complete our research and move onto human subjects by 2020. However, this accelerated time frame depends on whether or not we receive support of people like you who have the strong desire to regain genital integrity for yourself or a loved one.
  • @MrDaydreamer1584
    Hey Gregory, You know how the AAP is supposed to renew their policies every 5 years. Did the AAP ever renew the 2012 circumcision policy statement??? Brendon Marotta was saying in his blog that they haven't renewed it.
  • @tasertag7513
    Someone had a Discord link? I'm from Mr Obvious btw.
  • @conveyor2
    Hi Gregory. Is Owl Thrasher going to re appear somewhere? Hope so.
  • I saw you have been suspended from Twitter, Greg. Are you on Telegram?
  • @NextScamdemic
    Great listen. I feel the guy came around intellectually, but that he still wasn't moved on a deeper level I think a major part of the problem is being conditioned to reflexively associate C with being a "medical procedure" that's "done by doctors". I would have gone through the medical tests by which we know cutting off part of the body has no place in medicine and when applied to any other part of the anatomy the "logic" of circumcision completely falls apart. I would have asked if he knew what it actually entails, a child's penis being placed within the confines of a steel clamp then crushed, sliced and partially severed. I would have proposed a doctor inflicting such a depraved, vicious act upon say, a baby's finger would be regarded as a violent sociopathic criminal, yet when the body part in question is THE PENIS, we waffle back and forth about "parents choices" in a general state of indifference. As for the woman, I think her indifference manifests in the form of over-intellectualizing and the only way to expose her hypocrisy would be to forcibly cut off part of her genitals and then to poll her as she's screaming bloody murder.
  • @-Batman-
    I listened to it, it was pretty chill 👌🏻 especially compared to the other one (Ralph retort). I'm interested what Nim's girlfriend thinks after all that though. Still not convinced? Too afraid to be in disagreement with her social circle?