NFT Games: Revisited (are we rich yet?)

545,370
0
Published 2023-12-31
One year ago, I began scraping the bottom of the gaming industry barrel. I found #crypto and #NFT games. While a common defense for their poor quality may be "it's still early", I've let a year pass. Are we still early? How much progress has been made on these games? Would I have made money had I invested in them?

In this new video series, I dive back in to my previously reviewed games, giving a second look and seeing how much has or hasn't improved.

They can't all be bad, right?


Subscribe:
   / @jauwn  
Buy me a Coffee:
ko-fi.com/jauwn
Follow me on Twitter:
twitter.com/Jauwnio



All views and opinions expressed in this video are solely my own and do not reflect the views or opinions of anyone else. All game footage and information is used for the purpose of review and commentary, and falls under the fair use doctrine. Video game reviews are subjective, and what I don't like, you might love. These videos are not intended to defame or harass anyone, nor are they made with any malicious intent. They are simply intended to provide entertainment. All information presented is based on my own research and understanding, and as such, there is always a chance I got something wrong. Always make sure to form an opinion of your own based on your own experience and research.

Do what you want with your money, and if you enjoy the games, feel free to support the creators!

Chapters:

0:00 Intro
1:07 Robotera
8:09 Tamadoge
15:16 Game of Silks
22:00 Battle Infinity
24:38 Lucky Block
29:20 Outro

All Comments (21)
  • @jauwn
    Happy New Year everyone! Here’s a long anticipated follow up to some of the first NFT games reviewed on the channel. Hope you all had a great year, and here’s to a 2024 full of “good crypto games” 😂
  • @LeafseasonMagbag
    “Terms and Conditions will be coming soon” is such a nuclear red flag what the hell.
  • @Feuerhamster
    Ironically, Jauwn is probably one of the very few people profiting from NFTs
  • @rainbowdice1366
    I always love how crypto people say they want decentralization and for no one group to have control over the ecosystem, and then immediately try to recreate centralized authorities anyway, like those “verifier” services. Because shockingly it turns out you need centralized nodes of decision making and trust for a system to function on any level. Almost like organizing resources and people into centralized groups is necessary to achieve goals? Nah, that can’t be it.
  • @Crowley9
    "It'll get better. We're just early." It has been fifteen years since cryptocurrency got started. Let's make a comparison. World Wide Web entered public use in 1991. Fifteen years later, Facebook and YouTube had recently gotten started. Cryptocurrency seems to be going backwards, having largely abandoned aspersions of setting up its own system of economy and is instead largely used for extremely volatile investments and outright scams.
  • @totalphantasm
    Silks is such a BAFFLING contradiction to the idea of an NFT. It’s value doesn’t come from the owning of the horse, it doesn’t give you exclusive betting right or real royalties from the horse. It’s only value is exactly what the company that sold it to you agreed to give you for it. If they chose to stop giving the royalties, it’s worthless and no different from if you were just using a normal form of data storage.
  • @CambriaBold
    I'm genuinely impressed that Tamadoge turned into anything. Sure, all it became was a collection of generic, mediocre-at-best ripoffs of more popular mobile games, but all the games and their crypto integration is entirely functional! Kinda sad that this is arguably the high-water mark for crypto in gaming.
  • i keep thinking about what the silk thing must be like for the irl horse's owners? imagine having random people contact you to ask if your pet has died yet omg
  • Just so you know, it doesn't matter if Lucky Block was headquartered in the Cayman Islands if they were allowing entries from US customers. They would still be subject to US law for doing business in the US. To avoid being liable to US law they would require a good faith effort to exclude prospective US customers. However, they wont get in trouble if the victims don't contact law enforcement to report the scam and get the ball rolling.
  • Remember when one of the biggest arguments for NFTs in games was that you could transfer game items, like bringing a Diamond sword from minecraft into Call of Duty? We had that before, and it was called Garry’s Mod. But now with Fortnite, we have a game with every IP and item in one game without any NFTs.
  • @con10pt
    Man the silks thing is just ludicrous, don’t know how anyone can justify spending money on stuff like that Love the new visuals btw
  • @Varg84
    Jauwn gotta be rich AF by now playing all these NFT games.
  • @greenhowie
    Really good to get a follow-up to these, most channels point and laugh at an obvious scam then move on. Genuinely reveals how blatant the corruption is through other media outlets. Don't forget to keep doing a few fun retro reviews alongside these, they're bloody good as well
  • @Elvan-Lady
    Love the followup. On some level it's nice to see that some of these aren't COMPLETE scams, but also I'm still never putting a penny into NFT "games".
  • @Tortellia
    What I love most about watching this channel is that the ads whilst watching these videos are all about earning “passive income on the internet” in the most dubious and stupidest ways possible, like Amazon dropshipping, shopify smth smth, audible audiobooks, etc etc.
  • @Huffmanxd
    I like when you said people say the games might get better over time and things chances but “crypto bros always say we just got here early” actually made me laugh lol.
  • @dr.cornwater2886
    Been awesome watching you grow over the year. Hope 2024 is even bigger for you Mr. Jauwnathan. Hope to see a Kryixsiva revisit at some point lmaoooo
  • @certainperson
    17:26 "doesn't seem fair to be selling a horse that died" That made my day. It's something that makes sense in context, but it's hilarious outside of it.
  • @Doub1eSpark
    Tamadogi is literally just a pay to win version of My Tamagotchi Forever. As someone who collects digital pets, it's just a bad game when you look at the competition. Heck, the Tamagotchi resale market is technically more profitable than Tamadoge even if I don't like resellers.