Intel's GPU is not what you think

405,454
809
Publicado 2018-10-07
Sources and Credits:
Intel youtube channel
Intel Newsroom
Ingebor on reddit
Soon Aun Liaw - IBM St. King Datacenter Render
NVidia Youtube channel
AMD youtube channel
Intel twitter
Videocardz com (9th gen leaks)

Additional market share stat: www.statista.com/statistics/735904/worldwide-x86-i…

All footage rights to the respective copyright holders, used for educational purposes. If your content is not credited please contact me directly.

#intel #arcticsound #intelgraphicscard

Todos los comentarios (21)
  • @Coreteks
    Consider supporting me on patreon if you like this series of videos, I have more planned for the next few days. Thanks for watching!! www.patreon.com/coreteks
  • @yarox3632
    📂 NVIDIA └📁RTX 2018 └📁Gaming Value └⚠️ This folder is empty
  • @rikschaaf
    0:54 "Can you think of a current technological titan in a similar position? A company that hasnt innovated for years, while its main competitors slowly but steadily steals their marketshare? A company that has become so complacent, they show very little interest in what their customers actually want?" Eh, Apple?
  • AMD needed that win much more than Intel. After bulldozer AMD was about to be shut down. The success of Ryzen is a second wind for a company that have a massive debt.
  • As bitter as this might sound...I think all companies are working on making cloud gaming the future, as a byproduct...and I don't want that!
  • @FreekaPista
    This video seems too “doom and gloom”. Intels $16B budget was primarily allocated to R&D, so dedicating a full $1B to manufacturing should have a major impact. AMD is approaching GPUs in a very similar manner to Intel, as it is focusing on Compute performance, and, as you mentioned in your last video, the only way that approach carries over to gaming is through Ray Tracing capabilities. Ultimately, gamers need to recognize that GPUs have seen a huge increase in uses beyond graphics processing. And most of these other uses, including mining, simulation, and data management offer a much larger market than PC Gaming. For the foreseeable future, I’d expect gaming performance to be a by-product of designs intended for other uses. I think AMD can capitalize on this trend by building higher performance APUs, and perhaps build dedicated boards with GDDR5/6 built directly into the board. Game consoles have been using this technology for the past couple generations, and with products like the Subor Z+ coming out, we’ve seen it be applied to Gaming PCs as well. Great video by the way - I love your approach of tying in a historical case (IBM’s failure in the 90’s) to Intels current position. Very few tech channels pull on as many sources of information as you do - and none produce content as polished as yours.
  • @mr_beezlebub3985
    Make sense. PC gamers, while numbering in the millions, are quite a small market when compared to server or data center, or other enterprise customers, and a lot of companies are interested in general computing on graphics processors
  • @deadmetalbr
    These three big consumer-facing companies (Intel, AMD, and Nvidia) ALL need a swift kick in the pants as their offerings over the last decade have been iterative improvements at best. Nvidia's RTX stuff looks cool on paper, but unless they convince Sony, Microsoft, and maybe even Nintendo of RTX's value to gamers going forward, it's not going to catch on in the long term. I miss getting excited about new hardware, now everything comes down to a ~10% performance increase generation-over-generation without mush else in terms of architectural difference.
  • @VirusXAX
    And i was thinkin: Intel is done... I learned a lot now!
  • @grischu8277
    We've seen AMD going full into GPU-compute (they've at least tryed) The Fiji cards were the first step, then their VEGA GPUs. They are (or at least were, at the time of release) monsterst for general computing and not even Nvidia could counter this properly. Of course Nvidia has Tesla, but thats still basically their mainstream gpus with a few optimisations and more ram (Quadro is similar)(considerably simplified). Or I think now it's more like the mainstream gpus are ascended from the server and compute ones (Nvidia Volta architecture: It launched way earlier that the RTX cards. Yes, raytracing cores weren't on the original volta cards, but plenty of tensor cores.) Comming back to amd; It's just that AMD knows that leaving gamers isn't a good idea, at least for now. We are still a bic revenue source for them. Especially in the cpu game and they take every bit of money they can. Not negatively, they've come from very far away. They've dveloped this scalable cpu-architecture that is (sort of) coming to us, but wasn't primarily developed for us. I think they've even mentioned to put more effort into compute, especially on the gpu side. That's how I conclude this. The next decade is going to be very interesting, overall. :P
  • @spinkick9270
    Awesome content. It's good for for us original YouTube tech channels. Not just benchmarks. Thanks
  • @faisalhaider007
    AMD has left Intel and nVidia confused and forced them to release polished, and innovation less ultra expensive products.
  • @karanvora2674
    I love your videos the points you make are not covered by most main YouTube tech channels. Please don't change the this genre of yours
  • @yaro7319
    Love how you do the Videos, really nice picture, audio and info, please keep up
  • @ny0men
    Thanks for the "military nonsense" thing, u earned your like ;)
  • @aformalevent
    great video! well researched and clearly very well thought out. It's great to see you releasing videos more regularly. Keep up the awesome work!