Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4o: Side-by-Side Tests

I think given no point when both are correct may bias the final result. Let's say, you've done 20 tests, 15 are the same results, 1 gpt4o is better, 4 Claude Sonnet is better. The score is then 4-1 for Clause Sonnet but actually it's more 19-16.

Summary: 1. both are great. 2. don't use either for fact finding. 3. Since they are both free, use both simultaneously.

The GDP 2018 question was actually answered correctly. According to every source I found on the internet, Germany was 4th and the UK was 5th.

Claude Sonnet is wayyy better for complex tasks and assistance in debugging.

Well researched. You document many of the use cases I need and use. An excellent video.

This was the best comparison video on YouTube. Great job man, subscribed.

Thanks for putting in the time and effort to make this video! I was wondering if I should renew my GPT-4o, or try Claude for the first time. Now I'm set on trying Claude. The video quality is amazing, keep up the good work! :)

Claude 3.5 and GPT-4o both have their strengths, and it’s fascinating to see how they differ. Claude feels more human, like it’s really trying to understand what I’m asking, but then I’ve noticed with the memories function in GPT the model I think knows a lot more when I’m trying to ask now so now has much better answers like Claude 3.5. My issue is sometimes it hits those frustrating blocks and says it’s unable to answer my question, which drives me nuts even when it’s nothing controversial and it clearly would know the answer. I noticed in one of their talking points that is one of their big things. They are working on as it is overly restrictive and they know it so improve that. GPT-4o, on the other hand, is super analytical but occasionally needs me to rephrase my questions to get the best answers. I’ve been using both for a while now, and here’s what I’ve found: Claude’s artifact mode is mind-blowing, it’s nice if you’re on an iPhone or iPad since no android app. GPT’s memory function is a game-changer, making it more accurate over time as it learns from our interactions. Wouldn’t it be amazing if they combined the best of both worlds? I’d love to see a deep dive comparison between custom GPTs like “Scholar” and the standard GPT-4o, especially for fact-based questions. Does the customization really boost accuracy?

I pay for both, primarily for coding, and haven't used 4o since Sonnet came out.

I've watched a lot of AI videos out there, this one was truly helpful. You've gained my subscribe & my full attention Patrick! Thank you!

Your channel deserves sooooo Much more attention😮

Claude premium plan gives less messages / dollar. It’s significantly more consistent in long and complex convos, but you reach the 5h message limit quickly

This video was really well made, and I enjoyed it through the entire video! I thought I was watching someone with 200k plus subs, based on the quality of this content. Keep it up, I’m subscribing now!

Beautifully done on the video bro.

Great job on the video dude! I also agree with your results for yourself at the end that discusses how you plan to use them. I like Claude but without those extra things, Chat GPT is my daily driver.

it sounded a little biased towards Claude

Great video. Thank you. Subscribed

What should they have done with the 1 second interval question to keep to 1 second exactly?

Excellent video, I think you did a good job of being objective. Just a note, if you're looking for conversation and support, tell GPT you're looking more for an emotionally supportive answer than a solution based answer. Then what you get out of it is very similar to Claude. Claude still deserves the point because your average user likely won't think to try that, but the option is there for people that want more conversational GPT.

on writing code, gpt 4.o is way better than sonnet 3.5 I tried them both multiple times, sonnet 3.5 sometimes does not understand when is a harder task. sonnet 3.5 surprised me when I asked for a solution, his answer was suitable for my task. Very good to have them both!